|
"The
demands, the very nature of this age of new technology and pervasive
electric circuitry, barely perceived because so close at hand, will
shape educations future. By the time this years babies
have become 1989s graduates (if college "graduation"
then exists), schooling as we now know it may be only a memory."
Public
education in America. Frustrating isnt it? You open the newspaper
and the Portland Public Schools are in turmoil each and every year.
The pundits say that nothing has changed in education in 30 years,
that we_re educating kids for a world that no longer exists. Truth?
Or Bullshit?
One Sunday morning after debating the countrys education woes with
my girlfriend we were browsing through a junk store and found a
copy of Look Magazine from 1967 with a big cover article on the
death of JFK. I flipped it open randomly and found The Future of
Education staring at me.
Seminal
thinker of his time, Marshall McLuhan and George B. Leonard (of whom
my Web search drew nothing conclusive to report here) wrote the 1967
article discussing what education would be like in 1989. A time capsule
ripe for the opening!
The
truth is, if you removed some of the 60s George Jetson hyperbole
("... four year olds may spend their playtimes discussing the
speed, range, and flight dynamics of jet aircraft...") it could
have been written yesterday. Thirty years ago the pundits were complaining
that nothing had changed in education in thirty years. That means
the public education system hasn_t changed in 60 years. Whats
the bright light here? Technology will bring changes and a new golden
age will dawn.
How
much has changed in thirty years? Yet the ideas in this article
continue to burn bright and the high minded predictions of a two-way
electronic network of ideas has at long last started to prove fruitful.
Wasnt the future wonderful? Here are a few choice nuggets. I hope
you have time to read
the full article and appreciate your own
historical comparisons between 1967 and 2001:
"The
very technology that now cries out for a new mode of education creates
means for getting it. But new educational devices, though important,
are not as central to tomorrows schooling as are new roles
for student and teacher. Citizens of the future will find much less
need for sameness of function or vision. To the contrary, they will
be rewarded for diversity and originality. Therefore, any real or
imagined need for standardized classroom presentation may rapidly
fade; the very first casualty of the present-day school system may
well be the whole business of teacher-led instruction as we now
know it."
"Central
school computers can also help keep track of students as they move
freely from one activity to another, whenever moment-by-moment or
year-by-year records of students progress are needed. This will
wipe out even the administrative justification for schedules and
regular periods, with all their anti-education effects, and will
free teachers to get on with the real business of education."
"The
student of the future will truly be an explorer, a researcher, a
huntsman who ranges through the new educational world of electronic
circuitry and heightened human interaction just as the tribal huntsman
ranged the wilds."
"When
computers are properly used, in fact, they are almost certain to
increase individual diversity. A worldwide network of computers
will make all of mankinds factual knowledge available to students
everywhere in a matter of minutes or seconds."
"The
world communications net, the all-involving linkage of electronic
circuitry, will grow and become more sensitive. It will also develop
new modes of feedback so that communication can become dialog instead
of monologue. It will breach the wall between in and out of
school. It will join all people everywhere. When this has happened,
we may at last realize that our place of learning is the world itself,
the entire planet we live on."
Amen
brother.
|